Compare Tools :
Date
January 2023
January 2024
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 12
Android 13
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
HyperOS
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.0, A2DP, LE
5.4, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm
160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
409 g
190 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G
Plastic, IP54 Rated
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black
Black, Gray, Yellow
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Helio G99
Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
Mali G615-MC6
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
12GB
8GB / 12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB
256GB / 521GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.58"
6.67"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2408 pixels
1220 x 2712 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
20:9 ratio, (~401 ppi density), 120Hz
~446 ppi density, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
9600 mAh
5000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 66W
Fast charging 67W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Quad Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 108 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
(Main) 64 MP, f/1.8, 0.7µm, OIS, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Thermal) 5 MP
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
16 MP
16 MP, f/2.5
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
3.5mm jack, Dual Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $280
~ $360
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €270
~ €350
Price in Euros (EUR).
The Ulefone Power Armor 19 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Poco X6 Pro represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Poco X6 Pro, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Ulefone Power Armor 19 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Poco X6 Pro.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro.
In terms of screen protection performance, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Poco X6 Pro distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Poco X6 Pro not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 with its ~401 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Poco X6 Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~446. The Poco X6 Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Poco X6 Pro, its elevated ppi of ~446 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Ulefone Power Armor 19.
In the realm of display hardware, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Poco X6 Pro boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Poco X6 Pro displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and the Poco X6 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and the Poco X6 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Ulefone Power Armor 19 nor Poco X6 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 equipped with Bluetooth 5.0, while the Poco X6 Pro comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.4 technology. In this scenario, Poco X6 Pro holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.4 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.4 in the Poco X6 Pro positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Ulefone Power Armor 19.
Now, Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 is equipped with 12GB of RAM, while the Poco X6 Pro offers a range of 8GB / 12GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Ulefone Power Armor 19 offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while Poco X6 Pro surpasses this with an impressive 256GB / 521GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Poco X6 Pro, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Poco X6 Pro stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, Ulefone Power Armor 19 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust MediaTek Helio G99 paired with the Mali-G57 MC2. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The MediaTek Helio G99 provides substantial processing power, while the Mali-G57 MC2 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Ulefone Power Armor 19, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.
Next, Poco X6 Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra processor and the Mali G615-MC6. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali G615-MC6 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Poco X6 Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Poco X6 Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro is likely to be comparable.
To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 is equipped with a 6.58" screen, slightly smaller than the Poco X6 Pro, which boasts a 6.67" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Poco X6 Pro marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
The main camera setup of the Ulefone Power Armor 19 surpasses that Poco X6 Pro, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Ulefone Power Armor 19 boasts Quad Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Poco X6 Pro falls behind with its Triple Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Ulefone Power Armor 19 enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.
Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 emerges as a standout against the Poco X6 Pro, showcasing an impressive 108 MP camera, while the Poco X6 Pro only comes with 64 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.
Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Ulefone Power Armor 19, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.
The Ulefone Power Armor 19 stands out with a distinctive capability that sets it apart from the Poco X6 Pro, that is inclusion of a dedicated Thermal camera. Sadly this feature are absent in the Poco X6 Pro, introduces thermal imaging technology that detects and visualizes variations in temperature. A thermal camera captures the infrared radiation emitted by objects, converting it into a visible image that represents temperature differences.
While traditional cameras focus on capturing visible light, thermal cameras excel in applications where temperature variations are critical, such as in search and rescue operations, electrical diagnostics, and industrial inspections. The dedicated Thermal camera on the Ulefone Power Armor 19 serves a specific purpose, offering users a valuable tool for tasks that require temperature-sensitive analysis, making it a unique and specialized feature within the realm of smartphone photography.
When discussing front camera features, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
When look on to front camera features of the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 16 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro stand on equal footing with an 16 MP configuration.
Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and the Poco X6 Pro. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Ulefone Power Armor 19 is a significant limitation when compared to the Poco X6 Pro, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Poco X6 Pro can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Poco X6 Pro contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.
Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and the Poco X6 Pro becomes a notable advantage. The Ulefone Power Armor 19, equipped with an impressive 9600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Poco X6 Pro 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Ulefone Power Armor 19 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Ulefone Power Armor 19 robust 9600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.
In a positive development, both the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Poco X6 Pro emerges as the more advanced choice. The Poco X6 Pro boasts a Fast Charging capability of 67W, surpassing the Ulefone Power Armor 19 66W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Poco X6 Pro as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Poco X6 Pro ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Ulefone Power Armor 19 and Poco X6 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Power Armor 19 has better overall performance than Poco X6 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Ulefone Power Armor 19 has a very similar overall performance to Poco X6 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Poco X6 Pro has better overall performance than Ulefone Power Armor 19, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.