Durability

TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the TCL 40 SE outshines the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~260, the TCL 40 SE surpasses the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, which boasts ~225 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the TCL 40 SE elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the UMIDIGI A11 Tab.

In the realm of display technologies, the TCL 40 SE equipped with an IPS LCD screen, holds a noteworthy advantage over the UMIDIGI A11 Tab which only features with TFT. The IPS LCD technology offers distinct benefits, including wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, and improved visibility in bright conditions. IPS LCD panels excel in delivering vibrant and true life colors, contributing to a more visually pleasing and versatile display, this advantage enhances the overall user experience.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the TCL 40 SE and the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, the TCL 40 SE emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 90Hz refresh rate, surpassing the UMIDIGI A11 Tab with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The TCL 40 SE with 90Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the TCL 40 SE that equipped with Wi-Fi 4, a noteworthy comparison arises with the UMIDIGI A11 Tab which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 5 technology. This distinction positions the UMIDIGI A11 Tab at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 5 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 4. So, the UMIDIGI A11 Tab with Wi-Fi 5 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the TCL 40 SE, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the TCL 40 SE is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.1, surpassing the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the TCL 40 SE a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.1 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the TCL 40 SE is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the UMIDIGI A11 Tab.

Leveraging NFC technology, the TCL 40 SE emerges as the superior choice over the UMIDIGI A11 Tab due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the UMIDIGI A11 Tab. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the UMIDIGI A11 Tab hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the TCL 40 SE enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, TCL 40 SE boasts 4GB / 6GB of RAM, surpassing UMIDIGI A11 Tab offering 4GB RAM. In this scenario, TCL 40 SE holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, TCL 40 SE emerges as the superior choice over UMIDIGI A11 Tab, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB, surpassing the 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. TCL 40 SE higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the TCL 40 SE, the UMIDIGI A11 Tab stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the TCL 40 SE, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The TCL 40 SE boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G37 processor and PowerVR GE8320, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G37 and PowerVR GE8320 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the TCL 40 SE to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, UMIDIGI A11 Tab is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the MediaTek Helio P22 processor and PowerVR GE8320. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the MediaTek Helio P22 and PowerVR GE8320 allows the UMIDIGI A11 Tab to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the UMIDIGI A11 Tab remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like TCL 40 SE can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the TCL 40 SE and the UMIDIGI A11 Tab may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The TCL 40 SE, equipped with a 6.75" screen, is notably smaller than the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, which boasts a more generous 10.4" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the TCL 40 SE emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 90Hz refresh rate, surpassing the UMIDIGI A11 Tab that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the TCL 40 SE translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the TCL 40 SE surpasses that UMIDIGI A11 Tab, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The TCL 40 SE boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the UMIDIGI A11 Tab falls behind with its Single Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the TCL 40 SE enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the TCL 40 SE emerges as a standout against the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the UMIDIGI A11 Tab only comes with 16 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the TCL 40 SE, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 8 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab stand on equal footing with an 8 MP configuration.

Sadly, the both of TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the TCL 40 SE and the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, with the UMIDIGI A11 Tab boasting an impressive 8000 mAh compared to the TCL 40 SE 8000 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the UMIDIGI A11 Tab proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the UMIDIGI A11 Tab can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the TCL 40 SE and UMIDIGI A11 Tab share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the TCL 40 SE and the UMIDIGI A11 Tab, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

At the security features, TCL 40 SE demonstrates superiority over UMIDIGI A11 Tab, primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with UMIDIGI A11 Tab, which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on UMIDIGI A11 Tab places it at a disadvantage, as TCL 40 SE provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.