Xiaomi 13 Pro

Xiaomi 13 Pro

Triple Setup

210 gram

4820 mAh

Android 13

6.73" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Dual Setup

620 gram

10000 mAh

Android 12

12.4" (Inch)

6GB / 8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

December 2022

August 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 14

MIUI 13

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

-

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

-

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
70

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

163 x 74.6 x 8.8 mm

285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

210 g

620 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum + Glass Case, IP68 Rated

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Blue, Green

Black, Silver, Green

Official available body color options.

Score

100
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 740

Adreno 650

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB

6GB / 8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.73"

12.4"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

LTPO AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1440 x 3200 pixels

1600 x 2560 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~521 ppi density), 1B Colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus

16:10 ratio, (~243 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4820 mAh

10000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 120W, Fast Wireless charging 50W

Fast charging 67W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C & Wireless charging

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm, 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 3.2x optical zoom

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm, 0.7µm

20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 8K@24fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@960fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

-

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $760

~ $460

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €750

~ €450

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with aluminum materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of aluminum.

The Xiaomi 13 Pro stands out with its distinctive glass cover, a more powerful feature that absent in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). This difference in material choice contributes significantly to the overall comparison between the two smartphones. Moreover, in the competitive market, these material are synonymous with a more durable build. Devices incorporating these materials not only exude an upscale aura but also assure users of enhanced resilience, reflecting a dedication to superior craftsmanship and design excellence. This nuanced distinction in materials underscores the divergent approaches to design and quality between the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4).

In terms of screen protection, both the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) come equipped with scratch-resistant glass. These devices provide users with a shield against daily wear and tear, ensuring durability and longevity. The benefits of scratch-resistant glass extend beyond aesthetic preservation, offering a practical advantage by safeguarding the display from potential damage due to accidental scratches or impacts. In this context, both the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) emerge as equals, providing consumers with a tie in the crucial aspect of screen protection and ensuring a reliable and resilient mobile experience.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Xiaomi 13 Pro outshines the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~521, the Xiaomi 13 Pro surpasses the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which boasts ~243 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Xiaomi 13 Pro elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4).

In terms of display hardware, the Xiaomi 13 Pro stands out with its LTPO AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Xiaomi 13 Pro with LTPO AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of LTPO AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Xiaomi 13 Pro that comes with 5G network capabilities, to the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) which lacks mobile SIM network support, underscores a clear advantage for the Xiaomi 13 Pro. In circumstances where users prioritize the use of mobile SIM features on their devices, the Xiaomi 13 Pro stands out as the preferable choice. The absence of mobile SIM network support in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may limit its functionality for users seeking seamless connectivity through mobile networks. Consequently the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the superior option in this particular aspect of comparison.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Xiaomi 13 Pro nor Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Xiaomi 13 Pro a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4).

Leveraging NFC technology, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the superior choice over the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Xiaomi 13 Pro enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is equipped with 8GB / 12GB of RAM, while the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) offers a range of 6GB / 8GB / 12GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Xiaomi 13 Pro presents a range of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB of internal memory storage, while Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) offers a 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Xiaomi 13 Pro stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 paired with the Adreno 740. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 740 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Xiaomi 13 Pro, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 processor and the Adreno 650. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 650 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) is likely to be comparable.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Xiaomi 13 Pro, equipped with a 6.73" screen, is notably smaller than the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which boasts a more generous 12.4" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Xiaomi 13 Pro surpasses that Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Xiaomi 13 Pro enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Delving more into the camera comparison segment, a notable distinction between the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) surfaces with the inclusion of dedicated Telephoto camera features in the former. The Xiaomi 13 Pro stands out by incorporating specialized Telephoto lenses that enable optical zooming, a feature absent in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). Optical zoom provides a significant advantage over digital zoom as it involves physical movement of the lens elements, allowing users to magnify subjects without compromising image quality.

This results in sharper, more detailed images, particularly in scenarios where capturing distant subjects is crucial. The absence of dedicated Telephoto capabilities in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) means it relies on digital zoom, which often results in a loss of image quality. Thus, the Xiaomi 13 Pro's inclusion of optical zoom through its Telephoto lenses contributes to an enhanced and versatile photography experience.

When discussing front camera features, the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Xiaomi 13 Pro outshines the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 20 MP front camera on the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Xiaomi 13 Pro stands out as more powerful than the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Xiaomi 13 Pro, a feature absent in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Xiaomi 13 Pro integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), with the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) boasting an impressive 10000 mAh compared to the Xiaomi 13 Pro 10000 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

In a positive turn of events, both the Xiaomi 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the superior choice. While the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) offers a respectable 67W Fast Charging, the Xiaomi 13 Pro outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 120W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Xiaomi 13 Pro as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Xiaomi 13 Pro provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Xiaomi 13 Pro demonstrates superiority over Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) places it at a disadvantage, as Xiaomi 13 Pro provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Wireless charging support
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported

Benchmark

Point Result

Xiaomi 13 Pro

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Xiaomi 13 Pro

Xiaomi 13 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi 13 Pro has better overall performance than Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Xiaomi 13 Pro has a very similar overall performance to Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) has better overall performance than Xiaomi 13 Pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Xiaomi 13 Pro

Xiaomi 13 Pro

Amazon
Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Amazon