Samsung Galaxy A40

Samsung Galaxy A40

Dual Setup

140 gram

3100 mAh

Android 9.0

5.9" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Single Setup

469 gram

6150 mAh

Android 11

10.1" (Inch)

2GB / 3GB RAM

Announced

Date

April 2019

August 2019

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

SM-A405*

SM-T51*

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 9.0

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

One UI

One UI 3.1

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.0, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

144.4 x 69.2 x 7.9 mm

245.2 x 149.4 x 7.5 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

140 g

469 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Blue

Black, Silver, Gold

Official available body color options.

Score

75
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Exynos 7904

Exynos 7904

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G71 MP2

Mali-G71 MP2

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
90

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

2GB / 3GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

64GB / 128GB

16GB / 32GB / 64GB / 128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

95
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

5.9"

10.1"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

Super AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2340 pixels

1200 x 1920 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

19.5:9 ratio, (~437 ppi density), Corning Gorilla Glass 3

16:10 ratio, (~224 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

3100 mAh

6150 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 15W

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Single Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 16 MP, f/1.7, 26mm, PDAF

8 MP, f/2.0, AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm

-

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

25 MP, f/2.0, 25mm, 1/2.8", 0.9µm

5 MP, f/2.2

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
80

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the rear)

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $320

~ $250

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €280

~ €220

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) surpasses that of the Samsung Galaxy A40, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Samsung Galaxy A40. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Samsung Galaxy A40 plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019).

When it comes to screen protection, the Samsung Galaxy A40 stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Samsung Galaxy A40 offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Samsung Galaxy A40 not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Samsung Galaxy A40 outshines the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~437, the Samsung Galaxy A40 surpasses the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), which boasts ~224 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Samsung Galaxy A40 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019).

In terms of display hardware, the Samsung Galaxy A40 stands out with its Super AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Samsung Galaxy A40 with Super AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of Super AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Samsung Galaxy A40 nor Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Samsung Galaxy A40 emerges as the superior choice over the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019). The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Samsung Galaxy A40 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Samsung Galaxy A40 boasts 4GB of RAM, surpassing Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) offering 2GB / 3GB RAM. In this scenario, Samsung Galaxy A40 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Samsung Galaxy A40 presents a range of 64GB / 128GB of internal memory storage, while Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) offers a 16GB / 32GB / 64GB / 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019). This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Samsung Galaxy A40, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Samsung Galaxy A40, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Samsung Galaxy A40 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Exynos 7904 processor coupled with the Mali-G71 MP2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Samsung Galaxy A40 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Samsung Galaxy A40 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Exynos 7904 processor and Mali-G71 MP2. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Exynos 7904 and Mali-G71 MP2 allows the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Samsung Galaxy A40 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Samsung Galaxy A40, equipped with a 5.9" screen, is notably smaller than the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), which boasts a more generous 10.1" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Samsung Galaxy A40 surpasses that Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Samsung Galaxy A40 boasts Dual Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) falls behind with its Single Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Samsung Galaxy A40 enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A40 emerges as a standout against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), showcasing an impressive 16 MP camera, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) only comes with 8 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Samsung Galaxy A40, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Samsung Galaxy A40 outshines the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), boasting a significantly higher 25 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019). In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Samsung Galaxy A40 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), with the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) boasting an impressive 6150 mAh compared to the Samsung Galaxy A40 6150 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

Upon closer examination, the Samsung Galaxy A40 stands out with its Fast Charging 15W feature, a capability absent in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019). This distinction positions the Samsung Galaxy A40 as a more favorable choice for users who prioritize rapid charging times. The 15W fast charging capability enables the Samsung Galaxy A40 to charge more quickly than the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), providing users with a convenient and efficient charging experience. In scenarios where time is of the essence, the Samsung Galaxy A40 fast charging feature becomes a notable advantage, making it a preferable option for those seeking expedited charging without compromising on device performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Samsung Galaxy A40 demonstrates superiority over Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) places it at a disadvantage, as Samsung Galaxy A40 provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Low quality body material used
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Samsung Galaxy A40

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 90
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Samsung Galaxy A40

Samsung Galaxy A40

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Samsung Galaxy A40 has better overall performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Samsung Galaxy A40 has a very similar overall performance to Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) has better overall performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Samsung Galaxy A40

Samsung Galaxy A40

Amazon
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Amazon