Realme GT2 Pro

Realme GT2 Pro

Triple Setup

199 gram

5000 mAh

Android 12

6.7" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

Quad Setup

332 gram

5280 mAh

Android 13

6.78" (Inch)

12GB RAM

Announced

Date

January 2022

December 2023

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

RMX3301 / RMX3300

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 13

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Realme UI 3.0

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

5.1, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
80

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm

177.4 x 81.5 x 12.75 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

199 g

332 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

White, Blue, Green, Blue

Black, Yellow

Official available body color options.

Score

75
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

MediaTek Dimensity 8020

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 730

Mali-G77

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB

12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.7"

6.78"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

LTPO2 AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1440 x 3216 pixels

1080 x 2460 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~509 ppi density, 1B Colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus

~396 ppi density, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

5280 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 65W

Fast charging 120W, Wireless fast charging 50W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C & Wireless charging

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm, 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.65, 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚

(Tele) 8 MP, 3x optical zoom

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 3 MP, f/3.3, AF, 40x magnification

(Night Vision) 64 MP, f/1.79

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm, 1/2.74", 0.8µm

50 MP, f/2.25, 1.0µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 8K@30fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, Dual-Band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, SOS Satellite

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $650

~ $490

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €590

~ €480

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Realme GT2 Pro stands as a conventional smartphone, whereas the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra emerges as a rugged phone designed to outperform in challenging conditions. When evaluating build quality for extreme conditions, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra stands out as the superior choice.

In contrast to the standard design of the Realme GT2 Pro, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra boasts a reinforced and robust build, featuring durable materials that enhance its resistance to impacts, drops, water, dust, and shocks. This rugged design ensures that the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra excels in environments where the Realme GT2 Pro may falter, providing users with a durable and reliable device capable of withstanding the rigors of harsh conditions. Whether facing adverse weather or demanding outdoor scenarios, the build quality of the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra positions it as the preferred option for users seeking a phone that exceeds conventional limits, ensuring durability and functionality in extreme conditions.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra.

In terms of screen protection, both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra come equipped with scratch-resistant glass. These devices provide users with a shield against daily wear and tear, ensuring durability and longevity. The benefits of scratch-resistant glass extend beyond aesthetic preservation, offering a practical advantage by safeguarding the display from potential damage due to accidental scratches or impacts. In this context, both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra emerge as equals, providing consumers with a tie in the crucial aspect of screen protection and ensuring a reliable and resilient mobile experience.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Realme GT2 Pro outshines the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~509, the Realme GT2 Pro surpasses the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, which boasts ~396 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Realme GT2 Pro elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra.

In terms of display hardware, the Realme GT2 Pro stands out with its LTPO2 AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Realme GT2 Pro with LTPO2 AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of LTPO2 AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Realme GT2 Pro and the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Realme GT2 Pro and the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Realme GT2 Pro nor Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Realme GT2 Pro is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Realme GT2 Pro a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Realme GT2 Pro is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra.

Now, Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Realme GT2 Pro is equipped with 8GB / 12GB of RAM, while the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra offers a range of 12GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Realme GT2 Pro presents a range of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB of internal memory storage, while Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra offers a 512GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Realme GT2 Pro stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 paired with the Adreno 730. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 730 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Realme GT2 Pro, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 8020 processor and the Mali-G77. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 8020 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G77 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra is likely to be comparable.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Realme GT2 Pro is equipped with a 6.7" screen, slightly smaller than the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, which boasts a 6.78" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Realme GT2 Pro appears to be in for some tough competition from the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra. While the Realme GT2 Pro settles for a Triple Setup, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Realme GT2 Pro Triple Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Delving further into the intricacies of the camera features on both smartphones, a distinctive characteristic emerges in the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, setting it apart from the Realme GT2 Pro, that is inclusion of dedicated lenses for Telephoto functionality. This noteworthy feature, absent in the Realme GT2 Pro, grants the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra the capability to employ optical zoom, ensuring sharper and more detailed results when capturing distant subjects. The absence of dedicated Telephoto lenses in the Realme GT2 Pro implies a reliance on alternative methods, potentially utilizing digital zoom, which often compromises image quality. The Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra incorporation of optical zoom through its dedicated Telephoto lenses signifies a strategic enhancement in the realm of smartphone photography, offering users the advantage of capturing distant scenes with precision and clarity.

Looking at the main camera features of the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, a noteworthy distinction emerges, that is Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra is equipped with the Night Vision camera feature, whereas the Realme GT2 Pro lacks this specific capability. A Night Vision camera is designed to excel in low-light conditions by utilizing infrared technology to capture clear images even in complete darkness. This feature proves invaluable in scenarios where conventional cameras struggle, offering users enhanced visibility during nighttime photography or video recording. The inclusion of the Night Vision camera sets the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra apart, making it an appealing choice for those who prioritize advanced imaging capabilities, particularly in challenging lighting environments.

When discussing front camera features, the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra holds a distinct advantage over the Realme GT2 Pro. The Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra boasts a larger 50 MP front camera, while the Realme GT2 Pro features a 32 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Realme GT2 Pro stands out as more powerful than the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Realme GT2 Pro, a feature absent in the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Realme GT2 Pro integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Realme GT2 Pro falls short in comparison to the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra. The Realme GT2 Pro is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, whereas the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra boasts a more substantial 5280 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

In a positive development, both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra emerges as the more advanced choice. The Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra boasts a Fast Charging capability of 120W, surpassing the Realme GT2 Pro 65W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Realme GT2 Pro and Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Wireless charging support
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Realme GT2 Pro

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 100
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 80
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Realme GT2 Pro

Realme GT2 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Realme GT2 Pro has better overall performance than Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Realme GT2 Pro has a very similar overall performance to Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra has better overall performance than Realme GT2 Pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Realme GT2 Pro

Realme GT2 Pro

Amazon
Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

Ulefone Armor 23 Ultra

Amazon