Redmi Note 10S

Redmi Note 10S

Quad Setup

178.8 gram

5000 mAh

Android 11

6.43" (Inch)

4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM

Vivo Z5

Vivo Z5

Triple Setup

187 gram

4500 mAh

Android 9.0

6.38" (Inch)

4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM

Announced

Date

April 2021

August 2019

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

M2101K7BG / M2101K7BI / M2101K7BNY / M2101K7BL

V1921A / V1921T

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 11

Android 9.0

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 12.5

FuntouchOS 9.1

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.1, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm

159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

178.8 g

187 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic, IP53 Rated

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Blue

Black, Blue, Purple

Official available body color options.

Score

80
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Mediatek Helio G95

Qualcomm Snapdragon 712

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G76 MC4

Adreno 616

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB / 6GB / 8GB

4GB / 6GB / 8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

64GB / 128GB

64GB / 128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

95
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.43"

6.38"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

Super AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2340 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~409 ppi density), Corning Gorilla Glass 3

19.5:9 ratio, (~404 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

4500 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

Fast charging 22W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Quad Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm, 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF

(Main) 48 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Depth) 5 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

13 MP, f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.12µm

32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@120fps / 720p@960fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@60fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

100
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (at the rear)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $230

~ $230

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €200

~ €210

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5.

When it comes to screen protection, the Redmi Note 10S stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Redmi Note 10S offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Vivo Z5 lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Redmi Note 10S not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Redmi Note 10S outshines the Vivo Z5, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~409, the Redmi Note 10S surpasses the Vivo Z5, which boasts ~404 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Redmi Note 10S elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Vivo Z5.

In a general perspective, the Redmi Note 10S equipped with an AMOLED display panel, and the Vivo Z5 also featuring an Super AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Redmi Note 10S and the Vivo Z5 align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Redmi Note 10S and the Vivo Z5 find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Redmi Note 10S nor Vivo Z5 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Redmi Note 10S is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.1, surpassing the Vivo Z5, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Redmi Note 10S a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.1 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Redmi Note 10S is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo Z5.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Redmi Note 10S emerges as the superior choice over the Vivo Z5 due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Vivo Z5. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo Z5 hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Redmi Note 10S enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Redmi Note 10S is equipped with 4GB / 6GB / 8GB of RAM, while the Vivo Z5 offers a range of 4GB / 6GB / 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Redmi Note 10S presents a range of 64GB / 128GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo Z5 offers a 64GB / 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Redmi Note 10S, the Vivo Z5 stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Redmi Note 10S, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Redmi Note 10S boasts a formidable combination of the Mediatek Helio G95 processor and Mali-G76 MC4, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Mediatek Helio G95 and Mali-G76 MC4 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Redmi Note 10S to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo Z5 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 processor and Adreno 616. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 and Adreno 616 tandem enables the Vivo Z5 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 is likely to be comparable.

When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5, the Redmi Note 10S boasts a slightly larger 6.43" screen compared to the Vivo Z5 is 6.38" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Redmi Note 10S surpasses that Vivo Z5, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Redmi Note 10S boasts Quad Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Vivo Z5 falls behind with its Triple Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Redmi Note 10S enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Redmi Note 10S emerges as a standout against the Vivo Z5, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Vivo Z5 only comes with 48 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Redmi Note 10S, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo Z5 holds a distinct advantage over the Redmi Note 10S. The Vivo Z5 boasts a larger 32 MP front camera, while the Redmi Note 10S features a 13 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo Z5 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Redmi Note 10S surpasses the Vivo Z5. The Redmi Note 10S boasts a substantial 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo Z5 falls slightly behind with a 4500 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Redmi Note 10S as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Redmi Note 10S is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo Z5.

In a positive turn of events, both the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Redmi Note 10S emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo Z5 offers a respectable 22W Fast Charging, the Redmi Note 10S outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 33W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Redmi Note 10S as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Redmi Note 10S provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Redmi Note 10S and Vivo Z5, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Redmi Note 10S

Build Quality : 80
Display : 100
Camera : 100
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Vivo Z5

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Redmi Note 10S

Redmi Note 10S

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Redmi Note 10S has better overall performance than Vivo Z5, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Redmi Note 10S has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Z5, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo Z5

Vivo Z5

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Z5 has better overall performance than Redmi Note 10S, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Redmi Note 10S

Redmi Note 10S

Amazon
Vivo Z5

Vivo Z5

Amazon