Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

Triple Setup

228 gram

5000 mAh

Android 13

6.8" (Inch)

16GB RAM

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Triple Setup

204 gram

5000 mAh

Android 12

6.8" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB / 16GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

May 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

A2023P

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MyOS 13

MyOS 12

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

163.9 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm

163.2 x 73.5 x 8.4 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

228 g

204 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum + Leather Case

Aluminum + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Orange

Black, Gold, Silver

Official available body color options.

Score

100
95

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 740

Adreno 730

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

16GB

8GB / 12GB / 16GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

512GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.8"

6.8"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1116 x 2480 pixels

1116 x 2480 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~400 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10+

20:9 ratio, (~400 ppi density), 120Hz, 1B Colors, HDR10+

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 80W

Fast charging 65W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm, 1/1.3", OIS, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm, 1/1.7", PDAF, Laser AF, OIS

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm, 1/2", OIS, PDAF, 3.3x optical zoom

(Tele) 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm, 1/2", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚, PDAF

(Ultrawide) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 1/1.7", PDAF

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

(Under Display) 16 MP, f/2.0

16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 1.22µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 8K@30fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps

Video Recording 8K@30fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $690

~ $720

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €680

~ €700

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with aluminum materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of aluminum.

The Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition stands out with its distinctive leather cover, a more powerful feature that absent in the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. This difference in material choice contributes significantly to the overall comparison between the two smartphones. Moreover, in the competitive market, these material are synonymous with a more durable build. Devices incorporating these materials not only exude an upscale aura but also assure users of enhanced resilience, reflecting a dedication to superior craftsmanship and design excellence. This nuanced distinction in materials underscores the divergent approaches to design and quality between the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~400 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.

In a general perspective, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition equipped with an AMOLED display panel, and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6e technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition nor ZTE Axon 40 Ultra holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra.

Now, Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition is equipped with 16GB of RAM, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers a range of 8GB / 12GB / 16GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition offers internal storage options ranging from 512GB, while ZTE Axon 40 Ultra surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. ZTE Axon 40 Ultra stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 paired with the Adreno 740. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 740 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, ZTE Axon 40 Ultra stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and the Adreno 730. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 730 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is likely to be comparable.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.8" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 64 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Transitioning to the distinctive camera features of both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, it becomes apparent that both devices share a notable advantage the incorporation of dedicated Telephoto camera lenses. This shared feature equips both smartphones with the capability for optical zooming, ensuring that users can magnify subjects without sacrificing image quality. The inclusion of dedicated Telephoto lenses in both devices underscores their commitment to providing advanced photography capabilities.

This feature enhances the versatility of the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, allowing users to capture distant scenes with sharpness and clarity. The parallel inclusion of this special feature reflects a shared emphasis on delivering superior imaging experiences, particularly in situations where optical zoom is paramount for maintaining high quality results.

When discussing front camera features, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 16 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra stand on equal footing with an 16 MP configuration.

On video recording capabilities, both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra stand out as excellent choices, sharing the notable feature of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). This technology designed to minimize the impact of shaky movements or vibrations when capturing videos. It employs sensors and actuators to detect and counteract any unintended motion, resulting in smoother and more stable video footage. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who engage in handheld video recording, especially in dynamic or unpredictable environments. The inclusion of OIS in both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra ensures a high quality video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and steady footage even in challenging conditions.

Battery Endurance

After evaluating the battery power of the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, it becomes evident that both devices operate on an equal footing, each equipped with a 5000 mAh battery. This parity in battery capacity implies that, in terms of power endurance, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra yield comparable results. Users can expect similar levels of battery life from both devices, making it a draw in this aspect of comparison. The matching 5000 mAh batteries ensure that users can rely on consistent and reasonably lasting performance from either the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra without a significant advantage for either device in the realm of battery power.

In a positive turn of events, both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition emerges as the superior choice. While the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers a respectable 65W Fast Charging, the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 80W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

Benchmark

Point Result

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Build Quality : 95
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition has better overall performance than ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition has a very similar overall performance to ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has better overall performance than Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

Nubia Z50 Ultra Photographer Edition

Amazon
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Amazon