Xiaomi Civi 3

Xiaomi Civi 3

Triple Setup

173.5 gram

4500 mAh

Android 13

6.55" (Inch)

12GB / 16GB RAM

Tecno Camon 18 Premier

Tecno Camon 18 Premier

Triple Setup

200 gram

4750 mAh

Android 11

6.7" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

October 2021

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

23046PNC9C

CH9 / CH9N

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 14

HiOS 8.0

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.1, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

158.7 × 71.7 × 7.5 mm

163.8 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

173.5 g

200 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Gray, Gold, Green, Purple

Gray, White

Official available body color options.

Score

85
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra

Mediatek Helio G96

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G610

Mali-G57 MC2

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

12GB / 16GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB / 521GB / 1TB

256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.55"

6.7"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

OLED

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~402 ppi density), HDR10+, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~393 ppi density), 120Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4500 mAh

4750 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 67W

Fast charging 33W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.77, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

(Tele) 8 MP, f/3.5, 135mm, PDAF, 5x optical zoom

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Ultrawide) 12 MP, gimbal OIS

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Dual Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

(Main) 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm

32 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 32 MP, f/2.0, 100˚

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

-

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

85
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $340

~ $340

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €330

~ €330

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Xiaomi Civi 3 exhibits superior build quality compared to the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, primarily due to the difference in their construction materials. The Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts an aluminum structure body, which generally enhances its overall sturdiness and premium feel. In contrast, the Tecno Camon 18 Premier is constructed with plastic, a material that, while lightweight, tends to be less robust than aluminum. This distinction in materials contributes to the perception that the Xiaomi Civi 3 offers a more durable and higher quality build from a general perspective. The use of aluminum not only imparts a sense of solidity to the device but also suggests a greater resistance to wear and tear compared to the plastic construction of the Tecno Camon 18 Premier.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Xiaomi Civi 3 outshines the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~402, the Xiaomi Civi 3 surpasses the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, which boasts ~393 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Xiaomi Civi 3 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Tecno Camon 18 Premier.

In a general perspective, the Xiaomi Civi 3 equipped with an OLED display panel, and the Tecno Camon 18 Premier also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Xiaomi Civi 3 and the Tecno Camon 18 Premier align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Xiaomi Civi 3 and the Tecno Camon 18 Premier find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Xiaomi Civi 3 equipped with 5G features to Tecno Camon 18 Premier with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Xiaomi Civi 3. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Xiaomi Civi 3 as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Tecno Camon 18 Premier may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Xiaomi Civi 3 emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Tecno Camon 18 Premier.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier. First, the Xiaomi Civi 3 features Wi-Fi 6, while Tecno Camon 18 Premier utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Xiaomi Civi 3 holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Xiaomi Civi 3 ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Tecno Camon 18 Premier.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Xiaomi Civi 3 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Tecno Camon 18 Premier.

Now, Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts 12GB / 16GB of RAM, surpassing Tecno Camon 18 Premier offering 8GB RAM. In this scenario, Xiaomi Civi 3 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Xiaomi Civi 3 emerges as the superior choice over Tecno Camon 18 Premier, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB / 521GB / 1TB, surpassing the 256GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Xiaomi Civi 3 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Xiaomi Civi 3 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra paired with the Mali-G610. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra provides substantial processing power, while the Mali-G610 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Xiaomi Civi 3, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Tecno Camon 18 Premier features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Mediatek Helio G96 processor and Mali-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Mediatek Helio G96 and Mali-G57 MC2 tandem enables the Tecno Camon 18 Premier to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Xiaomi Civi 3 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is equipped with a 6.55" screen, slightly smaller than the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, which boasts a 6.7" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Tecno Camon 18 Premier marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Xiaomi Civi 3 introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Tecno Camon 18 Premier boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Tecno Camon 18 Premier holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Xiaomi Civi 3. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Delving further into the intricacies of the camera features on both smartphones, a distinctive characteristic emerges in the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, setting it apart from the Xiaomi Civi 3, that is inclusion of dedicated lenses for Telephoto functionality. This noteworthy feature, absent in the Xiaomi Civi 3, grants the Tecno Camon 18 Premier the capability to employ optical zoom, ensuring sharper and more detailed results when capturing distant subjects. The absence of dedicated Telephoto lenses in the Xiaomi Civi 3 implies a reliance on alternative methods, potentially utilizing digital zoom, which often compromises image quality. The Tecno Camon 18 Premier incorporation of optical zoom through its dedicated Telephoto lenses signifies a strategic enhancement in the realm of smartphone photography, offering users the advantage of capturing distant scenes with precision and clarity.

It's evident that the Xiaomi Civi 3 holds a distinct advantage over the Tecno Camon 18 Premier in terms of front camera capabilities. The Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts a Dual Setup, offering a more sophisticated and versatile approach to capturing selfies compared to the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, which features a Single Setup. The Dual Setup configuration on the Xiaomi Civi 3 opens up possibilities for advanced imaging and creative possibilities, catering to users who prioritize a richer and more comprehensive front camera experience. This significant difference in front camera setups establishes the Xiaomi Civi 3 as a superior option for individuals who place a premium on advanced selfie capabilities and diverse photography options.

When look on to front camera features of the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.

Interesting distinction arises when comparing the front camera features of the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier. The Xiaomi Civi 3 sets itself apart by incorporating dedicated ultrawide lenses in its front camera setup, a feature that significantly enhances its selfie capabilities. Unfortunately, this particular feature is absent in the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, placing the Xiaomi Civi 3 at an advantage in terms of front camera performance, especially for those who value a wider perspective in their selfies. The inclusion of dedicated ultrawide lenses on the Xiaomi Civi 3, making it a favorable choice for individuals seeking advanced front camera features.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Xiaomi Civi 3 stands out as more powerful than the Tecno Camon 18 Premier, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Xiaomi Civi 3, a feature absent in the Tecno Camon 18 Premier. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Tecno Camon 18 Premier may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Xiaomi Civi 3 integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Xiaomi Civi 3 falls short in comparison to the Tecno Camon 18 Premier. The Xiaomi Civi 3 is equipped with a 4500 mAh battery, whereas the Tecno Camon 18 Premier boasts a more substantial 4750 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Tecno Camon 18 Premier as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Tecno Camon 18 Premier translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

In a positive turn of events, both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Xiaomi Civi 3 emerges as the superior choice. While the Tecno Camon 18 Premier offers a respectable 33W Fast Charging, the Xiaomi Civi 3 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 67W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Xiaomi Civi 3 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Xiaomi Civi 3 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Tecno Camon 18 Premier, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Average sound & audio quality

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Xiaomi Civi 3

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Tecno Camon 18 Premier

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Xiaomi Civi 3

Xiaomi Civi 3

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi Civi 3 has better overall performance than Tecno Camon 18 Premier, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Xiaomi Civi 3 has a very similar overall performance to Tecno Camon 18 Premier, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Tecno Camon 18 Premier

Tecno Camon 18 Premier

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Tecno Camon 18 Premier has better overall performance than Xiaomi Civi 3, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Xiaomi Civi 3

Xiaomi Civi 3

Amazon
Tecno Camon 18 Premier

Tecno Camon 18 Premier

Amazon