Motorola Moto E13

Motorola Moto E13

Single Setup

179.5 gram

5000 mAh

Android 13

6.5" (Inch)

2GB RAM

Realme 5

Realme 5

Quad Setup

198 gram

5000 mAh

Android 10

6.5" (Inch)

3GB / 4GB RAM

Announced

Date

January 2023

July 2019

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

RMX1911 / RMX1919 / RMX1927

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 10

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Realme UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.0, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

MicroUSB 2.0

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm

164.4 x 75.6 x 9.3 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

179.5 g

198 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Gray, Green

Blue, Purple

Official available body color options.

Score

75
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Unisoc T606

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MP1

Adreno 610

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

80
90

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

2GB

3GB / 4GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

64GB

32GB / 64GB / 128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

95
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.5"

6.5"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

720 x 1600 pixels

720 x 1600 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~270 ppi density)

20:9 ratio, (~269 ppi density), Corning Gorilla Glass 3+

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

-

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

MicroUSB 2.0

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

85
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Single Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

13 MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm, PDAF

(Main) 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm

13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/3.1", 1.12µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

80
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

-

Fingerprint (at the rear)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

80
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $130

~ $200

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €120

~ €180

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Motorola Moto E13 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Realme 5 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Realme 5 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Motorola Moto E13 outshines the Realme 5, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~270, the Motorola Moto E13 surpasses the Realme 5, which boasts ~269 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Motorola Moto E13 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Realme 5.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Motorola Moto E13 and the Realme 5 align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Motorola Moto E13 and the Realme 5 find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Motorola Moto E13 nor Realme 5 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Motorola Moto E13 and the Realme 5, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Unfortunately, both the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Motorola Moto E13 offers a RAM configuration of 2GB, while the Realme 5 boasts a more substantial 3GB / 4GB RAM range. Clearly, the Realme 5 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Motorola Moto E13 offers internal storage options ranging from 64GB, while Realme 5 surpasses this with an impressive 32GB / 64GB / 128GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Realme 5, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Realme 5 stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Differing from the Motorola Moto E13, the Realme 5 stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Motorola Moto E13, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Motorola Moto E13 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor coupled with the Mali-G57 MP1. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Motorola Moto E13 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Motorola Moto E13 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Realme 5 is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 processor and Adreno 610. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 and Adreno 610 allows the Realme 5 to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Realme 5 remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Motorola Moto E13 comes with less RAM than Realme 5. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Realme 5 holds an advantage over the Motorola Moto E13 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Realme 5, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.5" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Motorola Moto E13 appears to be in for some tough competition from the Realme 5. While the Motorola Moto E13 settles for a Single Setup, the Realme 5 takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Realme 5 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Motorola Moto E13 Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Realme 5 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Motorola Moto E13 emerges as a standout against the Realme 5, showcasing an impressive 13 MP camera, while the Realme 5 only comes with 12 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Motorola Moto E13, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Realme 5 holds a distinct advantage over the Motorola Moto E13. The Realme 5 boasts a larger 13 MP front camera, while the Motorola Moto E13 features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Realme 5 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

After evaluating the battery power of the Motorola Moto E13 and the Realme 5, it becomes evident that both devices operate on an equal footing, each equipped with a 5000 mAh battery. This parity in battery capacity implies that, in terms of power endurance, the Motorola Moto E13 and the Realme 5 yield comparable results. Users can expect similar levels of battery life from both devices, making it a draw in this aspect of comparison. The matching 5000 mAh batteries ensure that users can rely on consistent and reasonably lasting performance from either the Motorola Moto E13 or the Realme 5 without a significant advantage for either device in the realm of battery power.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the Motorola Moto E13 and Realme 5 share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the Motorola Moto E13 and the Realme 5, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

At the security features, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto E13 falls short in comparison to the Realme 5. The Motorola Moto E13 lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Realme 5, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Realme 5 holds a distinct advantage over the Motorola Moto E13. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Motorola Moto E13 emphasizes the Realme 5 superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Expandable storage with external memory card

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Uses outdated USB port model
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Motorola Moto E13

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 80
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Realme 5

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 100
Performance : 90
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 90
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Motorola Moto E13

Motorola Moto E13

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto E13 has better overall performance than Realme 5, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Motorola Moto E13 has a very similar overall performance to Realme 5, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Realme 5

Realme 5

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Realme 5 has better overall performance than Motorola Moto E13, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Motorola Moto E13

Motorola Moto E13

Amazon
Realme 5

Realme 5

Amazon