ZTE Libero 5G III

ZTE Libero 5G III

Triple Setup

207 gram

4120 mAh

Android 12

6.67" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Poco X2

Poco X2

Quad Setup

208 gram

5000 mAh

Android 11

6.67" (Inch)

6GB / 8GB RAM

Announced

Date

December 2022

February 2020

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

MZB901* / MZB874*

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MyOS 12

MIUI 12.5

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.0, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

168 x 78 x 9.1 mm

165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

207 g

208 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic, IP57 Rated

Plastic + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Purple

Blue, Purple, Red

Official available body color options.

Score

80
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 700

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mail-G57 MC2

Adreno 618

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

6GB / 8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

64GB

64GB / 128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

95
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.67"

6.67"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~395 ppi density

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10, Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Ion

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4120 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

-

Fast charging 27W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

85
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 13 MP, AF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP

(Main) 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm, 1/3.4", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@120fps / 720p@960fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $210

~ $230

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €200

~ €200

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

While the ZTE Libero 5G III features with a standard cover, the Poco X2 distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Poco X2 apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Poco X2 more intriguing than the ZTE Libero 5G III, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

In terms of screen protection performance, the ZTE Libero 5G III appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Poco X2 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Poco X2 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~395 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.

In terms of display hardware, the ZTE Libero 5G III stands out with its AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Poco X2, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The ZTE Libero 5G III with AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the ZTE Libero 5G III boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Poco X2 takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

Comparing ZTE Libero 5G III equipped with 5G features to Poco X2 with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for ZTE Libero 5G III. The incorporation of 5G technology positions ZTE Libero 5G III as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Poco X2 may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, ZTE Libero 5G III emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Poco X2.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the ZTE Libero 5G III that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Poco X2 which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Poco X2 at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Poco X2 with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the ZTE Libero 5G III, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the ZTE Libero 5G III and the Poco X2, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Leveraging NFC technology, the ZTE Libero 5G III emerges as the superior choice over the Poco X2 due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Poco X2. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Poco X2 hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the ZTE Libero 5G III enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, ZTE Libero 5G III offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Poco X2 boasts a more substantial 6GB / 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the Poco X2 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, ZTE Libero 5G III offers internal storage options ranging from 64GB, while Poco X2 surpasses this with an impressive 64GB / 128GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Poco X2, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Poco X2 stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Differing from the ZTE Libero 5G III, the Poco X2 stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the ZTE Libero 5G III, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The ZTE Libero 5G III adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 700 processor coupled with the Mail-G57 MC2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the ZTE Libero 5G III may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the ZTE Libero 5G III sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Poco X2 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G processor and Adreno 618. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G and Adreno 618 tandem enables the Poco X2 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is ZTE Libero 5G III comes with less RAM than Poco X2. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Poco X2 holds an advantage over the ZTE Libero 5G III due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Poco X2, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.67" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the ZTE Libero 5G III boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Poco X2 takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Poco X2 in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

ZTE Libero 5G III appears to be in for some tough competition from the Poco X2. While the ZTE Libero 5G III settles for a Triple Setup, the Poco X2 takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Poco X2 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the ZTE Libero 5G III Triple Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Poco X2 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the ZTE Libero 5G III introduces a 13 MP camera, while the Poco X2 boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Poco X2 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the ZTE Libero 5G III. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Poco X2, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Examining the front camera features, it's evident that the Poco X2 outshines the ZTE Libero 5G III due to its Dual Setup, providing users with a more expansive and versatile photography experience. In contrast, the ZTE Libero 5G III is equipped with a Single Setup front camera, limiting its range of capabilities in comparison to the Poco X2. The Dual Setup configuration on the Poco X2 not only enhances the potential for creative and high quality selfies but also offers users a broader set of options for capturing different perspectives. This notable difference in front camera setups positions the Poco X2 as a more advanced and feature rich choice for those who prioritize a comprehensive front camera experience.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Poco X2 holds a distinct advantage over the ZTE Libero 5G III. The Poco X2 boasts a larger 20 MP front camera, while the ZTE Libero 5G III features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Poco X2 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

A closer inspection of the front camera features on the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 reveals a notable discrepancy, positioning the Poco X2 as the more advanced option. The Poco X2 incorporates a dedicated depth sensor, a powerful addition that significantly enhances the device's selfie capabilities. This depth sensor allows for more accurate depth perception, resulting in superior portrait mode effects and overall improved image quality. In contrast, the ZTE Libero 5G III lacks such advanced features, relying on a basic front camera setup.

Sadly, the both of ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the ZTE Libero 5G III falls short in comparison to the Poco X2. The ZTE Libero 5G III is equipped with a 4120 mAh battery, whereas the Poco X2 boasts a more substantial 5000 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Poco X2 as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Poco X2 translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

Then, if we comparing the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2, it becomes evident that the Poco X2 holds a significant advantage. The Poco X2 is equipped with Fast Charging 27W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the ZTE Libero 5G III. This distinction gives the Poco X2 a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the Poco X2 ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the ZTE Libero 5G III. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the Poco X2 stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the ZTE Libero 5G III and Poco X2, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

ZTE Libero 5G III

Build Quality : 80
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Poco X2

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 100
Performance : 100
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

ZTE Libero 5G III

ZTE Libero 5G III

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that ZTE Libero 5G III has better overall performance than Poco X2, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that ZTE Libero 5G III has a very similar overall performance to Poco X2, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Poco X2

Poco X2

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Poco X2 has better overall performance than ZTE Libero 5G III, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

ZTE Libero 5G III

ZTE Libero 5G III

Amazon
Poco X2

Poco X2

Amazon