Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

Triple Setup

409 gram

9600 mAh

Android 12

6.58" (Inch)

12GB RAM

Vivo X80 Lite

Vivo X80 Lite

Triple Setup

186 gram

4500 mAh

Android 12

6.44" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

January 2023

September 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

FuntouchOS 12

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.0, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm

159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

409 g

186 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G

Plastic + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black

Black, Gold

Official available body color options.

Score

100
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 900

MediaTek Dimensity 900

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G68 MC4

Mali-G68 MC4

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

12GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.58"

6.44"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2408 pixels

1080 x 2404 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~401 ppi density), 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5

20:9 ratio, (~409 ppi density), 90Hz, HDR10+

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

9600 mAh

4500 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 66W

Fast charging 44W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 108 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.8, 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚, 1/4", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm

50 MP, f/2.0, AF

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

-

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
85

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $410

~ $510

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €400

~ €500

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Ulefone Armor 18 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Vivo X80 Lite represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Ulefone Armor 18 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Vivo X80 Lite, the Ulefone Armor 18 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Ulefone Armor 18 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Vivo X80 Lite.

While the Ulefone Armor 18 features with a standard cover, the Vivo X80 Lite distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo X80 Lite apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo X80 Lite more intriguing than the Ulefone Armor 18, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

When it comes to screen protection, the Ulefone Armor 18 stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Ulefone Armor 18 offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Vivo X80 Lite lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Ulefone Armor 18 not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Ulefone Armor 18 with its ~401 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo X80 Lite, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~409. The Vivo X80 Lite gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo X80 Lite, its elevated ppi of ~409 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Ulefone Armor 18.

In the realm of display hardware, the Ulefone Armor 18 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo X80 Lite boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo X80 Lite displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Ulefone Armor 18 and the Vivo X80 Lite, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Vivo X80 Lite with 90Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Ulefone Armor 18 with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite. First, the Ulefone Armor 18 features Wi-Fi 6, while Vivo X80 Lite utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Ulefone Armor 18 holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Ulefone Armor 18 ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Vivo X80 Lite.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Ulefone Armor 18 equipped with Bluetooth 5.0, while the Vivo X80 Lite comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.2 technology. In this scenario, Vivo X80 Lite holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.2 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.2 in the Vivo X80 Lite positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Ulefone Armor 18.

Now, Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Ulefone Armor 18 boasts 12GB of RAM, surpassing Vivo X80 Lite offering 8GB RAM. In this scenario, Ulefone Armor 18 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Ulefone Armor 18 presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo X80 Lite offers a 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Ulefone Armor 18 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust MediaTek Dimensity 900 paired with the Mali-G68 MC4. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 900 provides substantial processing power, while the Mali-G68 MC4 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Ulefone Armor 18, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Vivo X80 Lite features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek Dimensity 900 processor and Mali-G68 MC4. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 and Mali-G68 MC4 tandem enables the Vivo X80 Lite to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Ulefone Armor 18 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite, the Ulefone Armor 18 boasts a slightly larger 6.58" screen compared to the Vivo X80 Lite is 6.44" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Vivo X80 Lite that only comes with 90Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Ulefone Armor 18 translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as a standout against the Vivo X80 Lite, showcasing an impressive 108 MP camera, while the Vivo X80 Lite only comes with 64 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Ulefone Armor 18, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo X80 Lite holds a distinct advantage over the Ulefone Armor 18. The Vivo X80 Lite boasts a larger 50 MP front camera, while the Ulefone Armor 18 features a 32 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo X80 Lite provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Ulefone Armor 18 and the Vivo X80 Lite. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Ulefone Armor 18 is a significant limitation when compared to the Vivo X80 Lite, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Vivo X80 Lite can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Vivo X80 Lite contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Ulefone Armor 18 and the Vivo X80 Lite becomes a notable advantage. The Ulefone Armor 18, equipped with an impressive 9600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Vivo X80 Lite 4500 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Ulefone Armor 18 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Ulefone Armor 18 robust 9600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive turn of events, both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo X80 Lite offers a respectable 44W Fast Charging, the Ulefone Armor 18 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 66W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Ulefone Armor 18 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Ulefone Armor 18 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Vivo X80 Lite, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Average sound & audio quality

Benchmark

Point Result

Ulefone Armor 18

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Vivo X80 Lite

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Armor 18 has better overall performance than Vivo X80 Lite, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Ulefone Armor 18 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo X80 Lite, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo X80 Lite

Vivo X80 Lite

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo X80 Lite has better overall performance than Ulefone Armor 18, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

Amazon
Vivo X80 Lite

Vivo X80 Lite

Amazon