Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

Triple Setup

409 gram

9600 mAh

Android 12

6.58" (Inch)

12GB RAM

Realme Narzo 50A Prime

Realme Narzo 50A Prime

Triple Setup

189 gram

5000 mAh

Android 11

6.6" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Announced

Date

January 2023

March 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

RMX3430

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Realme UI 2.0

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.0, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm

164.4 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

409 g

189 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black

Black, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

100
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 900

Unisoc Tiger T612

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G68 MC4

Mali-G57

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

12GB

4GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

64GB / 128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.58"

6.6"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2408 pixels

1080 x 2408 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~401 ppi density), 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5

20:9 ratio, (~400 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

9600 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 66W

Fast charging 18W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 108 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Depth) 0.3 MP, f/2.8

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm

8 MP, f/2.0

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $410

~ $130

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €400

~ €110

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Ulefone Armor 18 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Realme Narzo 50A Prime represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Ulefone Armor 18 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, the Ulefone Armor 18 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Ulefone Armor 18 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Realme Narzo 50A Prime.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime.

When it comes to screen protection, the Ulefone Armor 18 stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Ulefone Armor 18 offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Ulefone Armor 18 not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Ulefone Armor 18 outshines the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~401, the Ulefone Armor 18 surpasses the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, which boasts ~400 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Ulefone Armor 18 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Realme Narzo 50A Prime.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Ulefone Armor 18 and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Realme Narzo 50A Prime with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Ulefone Armor 18 with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Ulefone Armor 18 equipped with 5G features to Realme Narzo 50A Prime with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Ulefone Armor 18. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Ulefone Armor 18 as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Realme Narzo 50A Prime may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Realme Narzo 50A Prime.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime. First, the Ulefone Armor 18 features Wi-Fi 6, while Realme Narzo 50A Prime utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Ulefone Armor 18 holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Ulefone Armor 18 ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Realme Narzo 50A Prime.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Ulefone Armor 18 and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice over the Realme Narzo 50A Prime due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Realme Narzo 50A Prime. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Realme Narzo 50A Prime hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Ulefone Armor 18 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Ulefone Armor 18 boasts 12GB of RAM, surpassing Realme Narzo 50A Prime offering 4GB RAM. In this scenario, Ulefone Armor 18 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice over Realme Narzo 50A Prime, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB, surpassing the 64GB / 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Ulefone Armor 18 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the Ulefone Armor 18, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Ulefone Armor 18, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Ulefone Armor 18 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust MediaTek Dimensity 900 paired with the Mali-G68 MC4. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 900 provides substantial processing power, while the Mali-G68 MC4 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Ulefone Armor 18, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Realme Narzo 50A Prime is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Unisoc Tiger T612 processor and Mali-G57. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Mali-G57 allows the Realme Narzo 50A Prime to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Ulefone Armor 18 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Ulefone Armor 18 is equipped with a 6.58" screen, slightly smaller than the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, which boasts a 6.6" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Realme Narzo 50A Prime marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Realme Narzo 50A Prime that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Ulefone Armor 18 translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as a standout against the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, showcasing an impressive 108 MP camera, while the Realme Narzo 50A Prime only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Ulefone Armor 18, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Ulefone Armor 18 outshines the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera on the Realme Narzo 50A Prime. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Ulefone Armor 18 and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime becomes a notable advantage. The Ulefone Armor 18, equipped with an impressive 9600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Realme Narzo 50A Prime 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Ulefone Armor 18 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Ulefone Armor 18 robust 9600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive turn of events, both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the superior choice. While the Realme Narzo 50A Prime offers a respectable 18W Fast Charging, the Ulefone Armor 18 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 66W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Ulefone Armor 18 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Ulefone Armor 18 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Ulefone Armor 18 and Realme Narzo 50A Prime, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Ulefone Armor 18

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Realme Narzo 50A Prime

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Armor 18 has better overall performance than Realme Narzo 50A Prime, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Ulefone Armor 18 has a very similar overall performance to Realme Narzo 50A Prime, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Realme Narzo 50A Prime

Realme Narzo 50A Prime

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Realme Narzo 50A Prime has better overall performance than Ulefone Armor 18, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

Amazon
Realme Narzo 50A Prime

Realme Narzo 50A Prime

Amazon