Sonim XP10

Sonim XP10

Dual Setup

320 gram

5000 mAh

Android 12

5.5" (Inch)

6GB RAM

Sony Xperia Z2a

Sony Xperia Z2a

Single Setup

163 gram

3000 mAh

Android 4.4

5.0" (Inch)

3GB RAM

Announced

Date

November 2022

July 2014

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

XP9900

D6563

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 4.4

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Xperia Stock ROM

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Micro SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, DLNA

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.1, A2DP

4.0, A2DP, aptX

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

MicroUSB 2.0

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

160.1 x 70.7 x 10.6 cm

137 x 72 x 11 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

320 g

163 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G

Plastic, IP58 Rated

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black

Black, White, Green

Official available body color options.

Score

100
80

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480

Qualcomm Snapdragon 801

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 619

Adreno 330

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
90

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

6GB

3GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB

16GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

5.5"

5.0"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 1920 pixels

1080 x 1920 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~439 ppi density

16:9 ratio, (~441 ppi density), Shatter proof glass

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Ion

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

3000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

-

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C & Wireless charging

MicroUSB 2.0

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

85
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Single Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, PDAF

20.7 MP, 1/2.3", AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

-

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP

VGA

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1440p@30fps / 1080p@60fps / 720p@120fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
80

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

-

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

85
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the front)

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $410

~ $280

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €400

~ €250

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Sonim XP10 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Sony Xperia Z2a represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Sonim XP10 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Sony Xperia Z2a, the Sonim XP10 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Sonim XP10 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Sony Xperia Z2a.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Sonim XP10 with its ~439 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Sony Xperia Z2a, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~441. The Sony Xperia Z2a gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Sony Xperia Z2a, its elevated ppi of ~441 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Sonim XP10.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Sonim XP10 and the Sony Xperia Z2a align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Sonim XP10 and the Sony Xperia Z2a find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Sonim XP10 equipped with 5G features to Sony Xperia Z2a with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Sonim XP10. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Sonim XP10 as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Sony Xperia Z2a may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Sonim XP10 emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Sony Xperia Z2a.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Sonim XP10 nor Sony Xperia Z2a holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Sonim XP10 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.1, surpassing the Sony Xperia Z2a, which only utilizes Bluetooth 4.0. This condition gives the Sonim XP10 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.1 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 4.0. Therefore, the Sonim XP10 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Sony Xperia Z2a.

Now, Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Sonim XP10 boasts 6GB of RAM, surpassing Sony Xperia Z2a offering 3GB RAM. In this scenario, Sonim XP10 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Sonim XP10 emerges as the superior choice over Sony Xperia Z2a, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB, surpassing the 16GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Sonim XP10 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Sonim XP10 boasts a formidable combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 processor and Adreno 619, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 and Adreno 619 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Sonim XP10 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Sony Xperia Z2a is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor and Adreno 330. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 and Adreno 330 allows the Sony Xperia Z2a to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Sony Xperia Z2a remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Sonim XP10 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Sonim XP10 distinguishes itself with its notably larger 5.5" screen, surpassing the Sony Xperia Z2a, which features a comparatively smaller 5.0" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Sonim XP10 surpasses that Sony Xperia Z2a, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Sonim XP10 boasts Dual Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Sony Xperia Z2a falls behind with its Single Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Sonim XP10 enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Sonim XP10 emerges as a standout against the Sony Xperia Z2a, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the Sony Xperia Z2a only comes with 20 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Sonim XP10, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Sonim XP10 outshines the Sony Xperia Z2a, boasting a significantly higher 8 MP front camera compared to the 0 MP front camera on the Sony Xperia Z2a. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Sonim XP10 and the Sony Xperia Z2a becomes a notable advantage. The Sonim XP10, equipped with an impressive 5000 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Sony Xperia Z2a 3000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Sonim XP10 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Sonim XP10 robust 5000 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the Sonim XP10 and Sony Xperia Z2a share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the Sonim XP10 and the Sony Xperia Z2a, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

At the security features, Sonim XP10 demonstrates superiority over Sony Xperia Z2a, primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Sony Xperia Z2a, which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Sony Xperia Z2a places it at a disadvantage, as Sonim XP10 provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Wireless charging support
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • NFC capability
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version
  • Average sound & audio quality

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Uses outdated USB port model
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Sonim XP10

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Sony Xperia Z2a

Build Quality : 80
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 90
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Sonim XP10

Sonim XP10

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Sonim XP10 has better overall performance than Sony Xperia Z2a, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Sonim XP10 has a very similar overall performance to Sony Xperia Z2a, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Sony Xperia Z2a

Sony Xperia Z2a

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Sony Xperia Z2a has better overall performance than Sonim XP10, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Sonim XP10

Sonim XP10

Amazon
Sony Xperia Z2a

Sony Xperia Z2a

Amazon