Honor 80 Pro Flat

Honor 80 Pro Flat

Triple Setup

186 gram

4800 mAh

Android 12

6.67" (Inch)

12GB RAM

Redmi K30

Redmi K30

Quad Setup

208 gram

4500 mAh

Android 11

6.67" (Inch)

6GB / 8GB RAM

Announced

Date

January 2023

December 2019

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

M1912G7BE / M1912G7BC

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Magic UI 7.0

MIUI 12.5

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

2G / 3G / 4G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm

165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

186 g

208 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Plastic + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Green, Pink

Blue, Purple, Red

Official available body color options.

Score

75
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 730

Adreno 618

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

12GB

6GB / 8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

64GB / 128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.67"

6.67"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

OLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 1B Colors, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10, Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4800 mAh

4500 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 66W

Fast charging 27W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 160 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Macro) 5 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.4

(Main) 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm, 1/3.4", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@60fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@120fps, gyro-EIS

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $460

~ $300

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €450

~ €260

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

While the Honor 80 Pro Flat features with a standard cover, the Redmi K30 distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Redmi K30 apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Redmi K30 more intriguing than the Honor 80 Pro Flat, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Honor 80 Pro Flat appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Redmi K30 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Redmi K30 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~395 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.

In terms of display hardware, the Honor 80 Pro Flat stands out with its OLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Redmi K30, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Honor 80 Pro Flat with OLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of OLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Honor 80 Pro Flat and the Redmi K30 align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Honor 80 Pro Flat and the Redmi K30 find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Honor 80 Pro Flat equipped with 5G features to Redmi K30 with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Honor 80 Pro Flat. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Honor 80 Pro Flat as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Redmi K30 may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Honor 80 Pro Flat emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Redmi K30.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30. First, the Honor 80 Pro Flat features Wi-Fi 6, while Redmi K30 utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Honor 80 Pro Flat holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Honor 80 Pro Flat ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Redmi K30.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Honor 80 Pro Flat is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Redmi K30, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Honor 80 Pro Flat a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Honor 80 Pro Flat is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Redmi K30.

Now, Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Honor 80 Pro Flat boasts 12GB of RAM, surpassing Redmi K30 offering 6GB / 8GB RAM. In this scenario, Honor 80 Pro Flat holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Honor 80 Pro Flat presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Redmi K30 offers a 64GB / 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Honor 80 Pro Flat stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 paired with the Adreno 730. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 730 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Honor 80 Pro Flat, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Redmi K30 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G processor and Adreno 618. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G and Adreno 618 tandem enables the Redmi K30 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Honor 80 Pro Flat can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.67" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Honor 80 Pro Flat appears to be in for some tough competition from the Redmi K30. While the Honor 80 Pro Flat settles for a Triple Setup, the Redmi K30 takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Redmi K30 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Honor 80 Pro Flat Triple Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Redmi K30 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Honor 80 Pro Flat emerges as a standout against the Redmi K30, showcasing an impressive 160 MP camera, while the Redmi K30 only comes with 64 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Honor 80 Pro Flat, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

Examining the front camera features, it's evident that the Redmi K30 outshines the Honor 80 Pro Flat due to its Dual Setup, providing users with a more expansive and versatile photography experience. In contrast, the Honor 80 Pro Flat is equipped with a Single Setup front camera, limiting its range of capabilities in comparison to the Redmi K30. The Dual Setup configuration on the Redmi K30 not only enhances the potential for creative and high quality selfies but also offers users a broader set of options for capturing different perspectives. This notable difference in front camera setups positions the Redmi K30 as a more advanced and feature rich choice for those who prioritize a comprehensive front camera experience.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Honor 80 Pro Flat outshines the Redmi K30, boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 20 MP front camera on the Redmi K30. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

A closer inspection of the front camera features on the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 reveals a notable discrepancy, positioning the Redmi K30 as the more advanced option. The Redmi K30 incorporates a dedicated depth sensor, a powerful addition that significantly enhances the device's selfie capabilities. This depth sensor allows for more accurate depth perception, resulting in superior portrait mode effects and overall improved image quality. In contrast, the Honor 80 Pro Flat lacks such advanced features, relying on a basic front camera setup.

Sadly, the both of Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Honor 80 Pro Flat surpasses the Redmi K30. The Honor 80 Pro Flat boasts a substantial 4800 mAh battery, while the Redmi K30 falls slightly behind with a 4500 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Honor 80 Pro Flat as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Honor 80 Pro Flat is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Redmi K30.

In a positive turn of events, both the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Honor 80 Pro Flat emerges as the superior choice. While the Redmi K30 offers a respectable 27W Fast Charging, the Honor 80 Pro Flat outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 66W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Honor 80 Pro Flat as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Honor 80 Pro Flat provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Honor 80 Pro Flat and Redmi K30, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Honor 80 Pro Flat

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Redmi K30

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 100
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Honor 80 Pro Flat

Honor 80 Pro Flat

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Honor 80 Pro Flat has better overall performance than Redmi K30, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Honor 80 Pro Flat has a very similar overall performance to Redmi K30, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Redmi K30

Redmi K30

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Redmi K30 has better overall performance than Honor 80 Pro Flat, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Honor 80 Pro Flat

Honor 80 Pro Flat

Amazon
Redmi K30

Redmi K30

Amazon