Xiaomi Mix 4

Xiaomi Mix 4

Triple Setup

225 gram

4500 mAh

Android 11

6.67" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Motorola Moto G71 5G

Motorola Moto G71 5G

Triple Setup

179 gram

5000 mAh

Android 11

6.4" (Inch)

6GB / 8GB RAM

Announced

Date

August 2021

January 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

2106118C

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 11

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 12.5

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

162.6 x 75.4 x 8 mm

161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

225 g

179 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum + Ceramic Case, IP53 Rated

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Silver

Blue, Silver

Official available body color options.

Score

100
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 660

Adreno 619

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB

6GB / 8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.67"

6.4"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus

20:9 ratio, (~411 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4500 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 120W

Fast charging 33W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 108 MP, f/1.9, 24mm, 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 8 MP, f/4.1, 120mm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 13 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 123˚, 1/3.06", 1.12µm

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

20 MP, 27mm, 1/3.4", 0.8µm

16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 8K@30fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@480fps, gyro-EIS

Video Recording 1080p@60fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the rear)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, Dual-Band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer, Color Spectrum

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $800

~ $360

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €700

~ €330

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Xiaomi Mix 4 exhibits superior build quality compared to the Motorola Moto G71 5G, primarily due to the difference in their construction materials. The Xiaomi Mix 4 boasts an aluminum structure body, which generally enhances its overall sturdiness and premium feel. In contrast, the Motorola Moto G71 5G is constructed with plastic, a material that, while lightweight, tends to be less robust than aluminum. This distinction in materials contributes to the perception that the Xiaomi Mix 4 offers a more durable and higher quality build from a general perspective. The use of aluminum not only imparts a sense of solidity to the device but also suggests a greater resistance to wear and tear compared to the plastic construction of the Motorola Moto G71 5G.

The Xiaomi Mix 4 stands out with its distinctive ceramic cover, a more powerful feature that absent in the Motorola Moto G71 5G. This difference in material choice contributes significantly to the overall comparison between the two smartphones. Moreover, in the competitive market, these material are synonymous with a more durable build. Devices incorporating these materials not only exude an upscale aura but also assure users of enhanced resilience, reflecting a dedication to superior craftsmanship and design excellence. This nuanced distinction in materials underscores the divergent approaches to design and quality between the Xiaomi Mix 4 and the Motorola Moto G71 5G.

When it comes to screen protection, the Xiaomi Mix 4 stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Xiaomi Mix 4 offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Motorola Moto G71 5G lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Xiaomi Mix 4 not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Xiaomi Mix 4 with its ~395 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Motorola Moto G71 5G, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~411. The Motorola Moto G71 5G gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Motorola Moto G71 5G, its elevated ppi of ~411 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Xiaomi Mix 4.

In a general perspective, the Xiaomi Mix 4 equipped with an AMOLED display panel, and the Motorola Moto G71 5G also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Xiaomi Mix 4 and the Motorola Moto G71 5G, the Xiaomi Mix 4 emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Motorola Moto G71 5G with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Xiaomi Mix 4 with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G. First, the Xiaomi Mix 4 features Wi-Fi 6e, while Motorola Moto G71 5G utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Xiaomi Mix 4 holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6e offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Xiaomi Mix 4 ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Motorola Moto G71 5G.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Xiaomi Mix 4 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Motorola Moto G71 5G, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Xiaomi Mix 4 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Xiaomi Mix 4 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Motorola Moto G71 5G.

Now, Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Xiaomi Mix 4 boasts 8GB / 12GB of RAM, surpassing Motorola Moto G71 5G offering 6GB / 8GB RAM. In this scenario, Xiaomi Mix 4 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Xiaomi Mix 4 emerges as the superior choice over Motorola Moto G71 5G, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB, surpassing the 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Xiaomi Mix 4 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Xiaomi Mix 4 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ paired with the Adreno 660. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 660 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Xiaomi Mix 4, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Motorola Moto G71 5G features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 processor and Adreno 619. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and Adreno 619 tandem enables the Motorola Moto G71 5G to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Xiaomi Mix 4 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Xiaomi Mix 4 distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.67" screen, surpassing the Motorola Moto G71 5G, which features a comparatively smaller 6.4" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Xiaomi Mix 4 emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Motorola Moto G71 5G that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Xiaomi Mix 4 translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Xiaomi Mix 4 emerges as a standout against the Motorola Moto G71 5G, showcasing an impressive 108 MP camera, while the Motorola Moto G71 5G only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Xiaomi Mix 4, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

Delving more into the camera comparison segment, a notable distinction between the Xiaomi Mix 4 and the Motorola Moto G71 5G surfaces with the inclusion of dedicated Telephoto camera features in the former. The Xiaomi Mix 4 stands out by incorporating specialized Telephoto lenses that enable optical zooming, a feature absent in the Motorola Moto G71 5G. Optical zoom provides a significant advantage over digital zoom as it involves physical movement of the lens elements, allowing users to magnify subjects without compromising image quality.

This results in sharper, more detailed images, particularly in scenarios where capturing distant subjects is crucial. The absence of dedicated Telephoto capabilities in the Motorola Moto G71 5G means it relies on digital zoom, which often results in a loss of image quality. Thus, the Xiaomi Mix 4's inclusion of optical zoom through its Telephoto lenses contributes to an enhanced and versatile photography experience.

When discussing front camera features, the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Xiaomi Mix 4 outshines the Motorola Moto G71 5G, boasting a significantly higher 20 MP front camera compared to the 16 MP front camera on the Motorola Moto G71 5G. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Xiaomi Mix 4 stands out as more powerful than the Motorola Moto G71 5G, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Xiaomi Mix 4, a feature absent in the Motorola Moto G71 5G. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Motorola Moto G71 5G may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Xiaomi Mix 4 integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Xiaomi Mix 4 falls short in comparison to the Motorola Moto G71 5G. The Xiaomi Mix 4 is equipped with a 4500 mAh battery, whereas the Motorola Moto G71 5G boasts a more substantial 5000 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Motorola Moto G71 5G as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Motorola Moto G71 5G translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

In a positive turn of events, both the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Xiaomi Mix 4 emerges as the superior choice. While the Motorola Moto G71 5G offers a respectable 33W Fast Charging, the Xiaomi Mix 4 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 120W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Xiaomi Mix 4 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Xiaomi Mix 4 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Xiaomi Mix 4 and Motorola Moto G71 5G, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Xiaomi Mix 4

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Motorola Moto G71 5G

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Xiaomi Mix 4

Xiaomi Mix 4

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi Mix 4 has better overall performance than Motorola Moto G71 5G, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Xiaomi Mix 4 has a very similar overall performance to Motorola Moto G71 5G, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Motorola Moto G71 5G

Motorola Moto G71 5G

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto G71 5G has better overall performance than Xiaomi Mix 4, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Xiaomi Mix 4

Xiaomi Mix 4

Amazon
Motorola Moto G71 5G

Motorola Moto G71 5G

Amazon